Kubernetes That Your Team Can Actually Operate

Most US engineering teams migrate to Kubernetes and then struggle to operate it. We design EKS, GKE, and AKS clusters that are production-ready from day one — with the runbooks and training your team needs to own it.

Duration: 4-12 weeks Team: 1 Kubernetes Architect + 1 Platform Engineer

You might be experiencing...

You migrated to Kubernetes but deployments still require tribal knowledge — three engineers know how to deploy and everyone else is blocked when they're not available.
Your cluster has no autoscaling, so you're either over-provisioned and overpaying, or under-provisioned and suffering outages during traffic spikes.
A pod consuming unbounded memory OOM-killed the entire node, taking down every application on it — because no one set resource limits.
You can't get FedRAMP authorization because your Kubernetes cluster has no network policy, pod security standards, or audit logging configured.

Kubernetes promises faster deployments, better resource utilization, and operational consistency. Most US engineering teams experience the opposite at first — complex cluster management, obscure failure modes, and a steep learning curve that bottlenecks on the two engineers who actually understand it.

Kubernetes Done Right: Platform Engineering, Not Just Container Orchestration

Kubernetes consulting USA isn’t about migrating your Docker Compose files to Kubernetes manifests. It’s about building a platform that your engineers can deploy to without understanding cluster internals — a self-service deployment platform with automated scaling, built-in observability, and GitOps delivery that makes Kubernetes invisible to developers.

The key components of a production-grade Kubernetes platform: cluster autoscaler so you’re not paying for idle nodes, HPA (Horizontal Pod Autoscaler) so your applications scale to meet demand, resource limits on every pod so a runaway process can’t OOM-kill your entire node, network policies enforcing least-privilege communication between services, and ArgoCD or Flux GitOps so deployments happen automatically on merge.

GitOps: The Operational Model That Makes Kubernetes Manageable

GitOps is the operational pattern that transforms Kubernetes from a complex system requiring tribal knowledge into an auditable, reproducible platform. Every deployment is a git commit. Every configuration change has a PR review and approval. Every rollback is a git revert. The cluster continuously reconciles to match the git repository — no manual kubectl apply in production, no undocumented state.

For FedRAMP and NIST 800-53 compliance, GitOps satisfies change management requirements by design: all changes are version-controlled, reviewed, and auditable.

Book a free 30-minute Kubernetes consultation — we’ll assess your cluster and identify the highest-impact improvements. Contact us.

Engagement Phases

Week 1-2

Cluster Assessment

Audit current cluster configuration — node sizing, namespace structure, RBAC, network policy, resource limits, HPA configuration, ingress, and monitoring coverage.

Weeks 3-6

Platform Hardening

Implement pod security standards, resource limits/requests for all workloads, network policies, RBAC least-privilege, cluster autoscaler, and HPA for variable workloads.

Weeks 7-9

GitOps & Helm Standardisation

ArgoCD or Flux GitOps deployment, Helm chart standardisation, environment promotion pipeline, and secrets management with External Secrets Operator or Vault.

Weeks 10-12

Observability & Runbooks

Prometheus/Grafana observability stack, alerting rules, SLO dashboards, incident response runbooks, and team training on cluster operations.

Deliverables

EKS / GKE / AKS cluster configuration (IaC)
Pod security standards and RBAC
Resource limits and HPA for all workloads
Network policy implementation
ArgoCD / Flux GitOps deployment
Helm chart library for all services
Prometheus + Grafana observability stack
Cluster operations runbooks

Before & After

MetricBeforeAfter
Deployment processManual kubectl commands, tribal knowledge requiredGitOps — merge to main triggers automated deployment
Infrastructure costStatic over-provisioned nodesCluster autoscaler reduces cost 30-50% for variable workloads
NIST/FedRAMP audit readinessNo network policy, no pod security standardsFull pod security, network policy, RBAC, and audit logging

Tools We Use

Kubernetes EKS / GKE / AKS Helm ArgoCD Prometheus Grafana Terraform

Frequently Asked Questions

EKS, GKE, or AKS — which managed Kubernetes should we use?

Use EKS if you're already on AWS — the integration with IAM, ALB, and other AWS services is seamless. GKE is the most mature managed Kubernetes product with the best autoscaling (Autopilot mode). AKS is the right choice if you're on Azure or have Microsoft enterprise agreements. All three are production-grade. We implement whichever fits your existing cloud environment.

How do we migrate existing workloads to Kubernetes without downtime?

We migrate workloads incrementally using a strangler fig pattern — new services deploy to Kubernetes while existing services run on EC2 or VMs until they're individually migrated. Traffic is shifted gradually using weighted routing. No migration requires a big-bang cutover or downtime window.

What does FedRAMP require from Kubernetes?

FedRAMP Moderate and High baselines (NIST 800-53) require network segmentation (network policy), access controls (RBAC), audit logging of all API server activity, encryption of secrets at rest, and pod security controls. Our Kubernetes implementation includes all of these controls by default for government and defense contractor clients.

Get Started for Free

Schedule a free consultation. 30-minute call, actionable results in days.

Talk to an Expert